Underexposed: What If Radiation is Actually Good for You?

Did you know that Japanese A-bomb survivors are outliving their unexposed peers? What if most of what you thought you knew about radiation is simply wrong? Find out how a rational assessment of radiation risks and benefits could offer increased health and vitality, as well as an avenue to nearly-limitless energy for the future.

Showing posts with label cancer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cancer. Show all posts
Sunday, March 13, 2016

Take Two Cobalt 60s & Call Me in the Morning

›
If we really believed in the LNT, we would have to conclude that routine use of X-rays for medical purposes would cause 100,000 deaths each ...
Wednesday, March 2, 2016

The Most Toxic Substance on Earth?

›
One of the noisiest guns in the anti-nuclear arsenal has been the cultivated fear of plutonium. "The most toxic substance known to man,...
Sunday, February 14, 2016

Who's the Leader of the Gang...

›
Irradiation of the pregnant animals - and the foetuses in utero caused an astonishing decrease of the mortality rate of the infected baby mi...
Thursday, February 11, 2016

Rummaging Through the Stacks

›
Where the radiation level is greater, cancer risk is invariably less . [Nambi and Soman. Further observations on environmental radiation and...
Friday, February 5, 2016

Chernobyl - Symbol of Unconcerned Totalitarianism

›
One can hardly compare the Chernobyl fire in the Ukraine to the alleged "Three Mile Island disaster" in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. ...
Wednesday, February 3, 2016

You Can Run, But You Can't Hide

›
If an increase in low-level background radiation caused any problems, decades of anecdotal evidence would have made Denver a ghost town . ...
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.